Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Goldstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter E. Hart, J.

The motion to reargue is granted and upon such reargument the original decision is adhered to. Plaintiff has not so clearly established the probability of her success upon the trial so as to warrant the granting of counsel fees at this time under section 1169-a of the Civil Practice Act. While plaintiff is not entitled to counsel fees under section 1170-a or 1170-b, if successful upon the trial in establishing the invalidity of the Florida divorce, it follows that she would be entitled to a judgment of separation under section 1161 of the Civil Practice Act and to an award of counsel fees…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meenan v. MeenanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Iverson v. IversonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Degen v. DegenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API