People v. Lanahan
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant’s plea vacated, his statement suppressed, and the case remitted to Albany County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
In the face of the finding by both courts below that defendant’s statement was spontaneous, we conclude as a matter of law that it was not spontaneous as that concept is recognized for purposes of delineating an exception to the rule that a defendant is entitled to suppression of inculpatory statements made by him in the absence of his attorney. The police arrested…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. MaerlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. LynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. StoesserNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LucasNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by61 opinions
- People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BryantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.