Legal Opinion

State v. Bragg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1998No. C1-97-2039Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Antonio Bragg appeals the district court’s determination that he is not entitled to recovery of his fingerprints and other identification evidence under Minn.Stat. § 2990.11(b) where misdemeanor charges against him were dismissed after he pleaded not guilty and no finding of probable cause was made. We reverse.

FACTS

In February 1997, Antonio Bragg filed a pro se petition for expungement of his criminal record, which included a 1985 petty misdemeanor conviction for fifth-degree assault and incidents in 1991,1993, and 1994, in each of which he was charged with misdemeanor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. R. L. F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API