Legal Opinion

CBA Pharma Inc. v. Harvey

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 30, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00014Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT ) CBA PHARMA, INC., ) ) Civil No. 3:21-cv-00014-GFVT Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION v. ) & ) ORDER KERRY B. HARVEY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Public ) ) Protection Cabinet, ) Defendant. *** *** *** *** Federal courts are limited in the types of matters they can adjudicate. The doctrine of ripeness is part of a collection of doctrines that seek to ensure that federal courts decide only “cases and controversies” as directed by the Constitution. So, courts cannot decide issues that are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API