Legal Opinion

Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 3, 2015No. 11-201CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patent Infringement; Deposition Fee of Expert Witness; Rule 26(b)(4)(E)(i); Rule 30(e); Rule 37(a); Reasonable Expert Rate; Deposition Preparation Time; Review of Transcript and Preparation of Errata Sheet; Cost of Deposition Transcript; Attorney’s Fees for Preparing Motion to Compel.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL EXPERT FEES IN PART

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to compel payment of expert deposition fees and Defendant’s cross-motion to disallow these fees in part. At issue in this case is Defendant’s alleged infringement of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Vanguard Products Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. Goldwater v. Postmaster General of United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  3. Jochims v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992
  4. Rhee v. Witco Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Lamere v. New York State Office for the AgingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. Buie v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. G.C. v. South Washington County School District 833District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  4. Lewis v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API