Grady Roper and Robert L. Benton v. Pullman Standard
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs Grady Roper and Robert Benton lost their jobs when defendant Pullman Standard, Inc. permanently closed its manufacturing plant in Bessemer, Alabama. At the end of their two year lay-off periods, plaintiffs applied for retirement benefits under the “70/80” provision of Pullman’s pension plan. Pullman denied plaintiffs’ retirement benefits because it found that they had not met the age/service requirements of the plan. Alleging that the 70/80 plan thus violated the provision 29 U.S.C.A. § 1056(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), plaintiffs filed suit against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fine v. SemetCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Sutton v. Weirton Steel Division of National Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1983
- Dhayer v. Weirton Steel Division of National Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1983
- Baker v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harry BELLAS, v. CBS, INC.; Westinghouse Pension Plan, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Williams v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Williams v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
- Ford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.