Legal Opinion

Marasco v. Fitzpatrick

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1962No. 35134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an appeal from an award in a workmen’s compensation case. The principal question presented is whether the evidence in the record supports the finding of the district court that the death of plaintiff’s decedent was caused by an electric shock or current accidentally received by said decedent in the course of his employment.

The facts are not in dispute. The only witnesses were those called by the plaintiff. There is, however, substantial disagreement as to the conclusions and inferences to be drawn from the facts. On appeal to this court in a workmen’s compensation case, we consider…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wessel v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mullen v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Rose v. City of FairmontNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Porter v. Brinn-Jensen Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Niesen v. Logan County Co-op Oil Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Niesen v. LOGAN COUNTY CO-OP OIL ASS'NNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API