Legal Opinion
Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers, United States Army
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 15, 1973No. 72 Civ. 2259PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GURFEIN, District Judge.
This matter involves the construction of a water intake and discharge facility for the cooling system of Consolidated Edison’s (Con Edison) planned 800 megawatt fossil-fueled electrical generating plant known as Astoria No. 6 in the East River.
The detailed description of the project is set forth in the earlier opinion of Judge Lasker, 349 F.Supp. 696 (August 1 and 4, 1972). The Court was then called upon to' review the sufficiency of administrative decisions in relation to the construction. The charge was that the Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) had failed to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connecticut Action Now, Inc. v. Roberts Plating Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Intervenor. Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barcelo v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
- Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985
- The Scenic Rivers Association Of Oklahoma v. James T. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Town of North Hempstead v. Village of North HillsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Scenic Rivers Ass'n v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.