Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,687 McDermott Incorporated v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc., Pullman Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 25, 1980No. 80-2306PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIRCHILD and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-appellant, WheelabratorFrye, Inc. (“Wheelabrator”), and plaintiffappellee, McDermott, Inc. (“McDermott”), are engaged in rival tender offers for ownership and control of Pullman Incorporated (“Pullman”). All three are large, highly diversified corporations. Late in the afternoon of September 19, 1980, McDermott moved in the district court for a temporary restraining order alleging that Wheelabrator had violated certain provisions of the Williams Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(d)-(e), 78n(d)-(f), and regulations promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. §§…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Fox Valley Harvestore, Inc., a Corporation, and Carmen W. Gruetzmacher v. A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Field v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Field v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Brill v. Burlington Northern, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
  4. Crouse-Hinds Co. v. Internorth, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1980
  5. Steinberg v. EspositoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API