Legal Opinion
Crouse-Hinds Co. v. Internorth, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 5, 1980No. 80-CV-772PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNSON, Chief Judge.
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
I
Presently before the Court are two motions made by plaintiff Crouse-Hinds Company which are aimed at blocking a take over attempt by defendants InterNorth, Inc., and I N Holdings, Inc. [hereinafter referred to jointly as InterNorth]. While both motions seek injunctive relief, they differ as to the grounds upon which such relief should be granted. The first motion asks that the Court declare InterNorth’s tender offer null and void because it violates the summary advertisement and “twenty day” rules of the Securities Exchange Act, 17 C.F.R. §§…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals, Incorporated v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Du Pont Holdings, Inc., and Conoco IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- In Re Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Reading International, Inc. v. Oaktree Capital Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Lantec, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.