Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Mooney J. Sherman & Son Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1949No. 15058PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

Appellees, Mooney J. Sherman & Son Co., a co-partnership and licensed, real estate dealers, sued appellant, O. H. Simpson, for five per cent brokerage for sale of real estate. The action was predicated upon a written contract of listing with appellees by appellant.

The instrument sued on, referred to by all parties as the listing contract, is a form printed on a card 4x6 inches, containing many printed words, leaving .blanks to be filled. The printed part contains the names of appellees as if printed for their use. Only a small part of the blank was adhered to. The price is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dallas Electric Supply Co. v. Branum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lewis v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Patton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Bomar v. MunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Popplewell v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Holmes v. HolikCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. West v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. DOWD MORE COMPANY RELATORS v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. DOWD MORE COMPANY RELATORS v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API