Legal Opinion

Bomar v. Munn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

L. H. Bomar and George W. Riddle, defendants, have appealed from a judgment rendered in favor of W. El Munn and F. L. Portwood, plaintiffs, for commissions claimed by the plaintiffs, as real estate brokers for the sale of certain property owned by the defendants. The cause of action asserted by the plaintiffs was, substantially, that for a valuable consideration paid by them the defendants gave them the exclusive right for the sale of the property for a period of one year; that plaintiffs had expended labor and money in endeavoring to find a purchaser; and that during the life of the contract…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dallas Electric Supply Co. v. Branum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lewis v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Holmes v. HolikCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Harry H. Rosin Co. v. EksterowiczSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  5. Wozniak v. SiegleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API