Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Beaulieu

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1920No. 21,666PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for Traverse county to restrain defendants from trespassing upon plaintiff’s properly or using their brick wall. From an order, Flaherty, J., granting a temporary injunction, defendant M. R. Mitton appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiffs owned lots 3 and 4 in block 13 of the original townsite of Browns Yalley, and Charles L. Beaulieu owned lot 5 adjoining, when an oral agreement was made between them, under which plaintiffs were to construct a brick building on their lots, placing the west wall of the building six inches over the east line of lot 5 the full length of 90 feet, and were to be the sole owners of the wall, until they were paid one-half of the cost of constructing it, upon payment of which sum the owner of lot 5 should be entitled to make said wall a party-wall to any building that he might erect…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rindge v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Mackey v. HarmonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Ingals v. PlamondonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hawkes v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Masson & Besanson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Hutchinson v. WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Union Public Service Co. v. Village of MinneotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Holmstrom v. BarstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. O. C. Hanson & Sons v. BeaulieuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Ramy v. LiedloffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API