Legal Opinion

Ramy v. Liedloff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1932No. 28,799Published

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants.

Plaintiff and defendants own adjoining lots or tracts in the city of Mankato in this state. Each of the two lots has a frontage of 22 feet on a main street of the city and extends back about 157 feet to an alley. There is a building on each lot. The two buildings use in common a brick wall on the line between the two lots. This -wall is about 12 inches wide and extends about six inches onto each lot. The front 10 feet of the building on defendants’ lot was constructed in 1872 by one Koerdell, the then owner of the lot. The lot now…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanson v. BeaulieuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Pillsbury v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API