Legal Opinion
Grant v. Shoes
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
The defendant moves to set aside the service of a summons upon it in pursuance of section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act. It appears that a summons in the above-entitled action was delivered to and left with Mr. W. Minehardt at the “ Miles ” shoe store at 441 State Street, Schenectady, New York, on Monday, December 14, 1953. Thereafter, and on or *555about the 2d day of January, 1954, the defendant filed a notice of special appearance solely to challenge the jurisdiction of the court and to set aside the alleged service of the summons upon said “ Miles Shoes ”.
The defendant’s moving affidavit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conklin v. Federal Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Northwest Engineering Co. v. RapplNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Levick v. Niagara Falls Home Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907