Legal Opinion

Levick v. Niagara Falls Home Telephone Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for leave to amend the summons and complaint and other proceedings by correcting the name of the defendant and making the same read “ The Niagara County Home Telephone Company ” in place and stead of “ The Niagara Falls Home Telephone Company.”

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

It appears, from the various papers read on this motion, that the action was brought to recover damages by reason of alleged negligence in causing the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. He met his death while in the employ of “ The Niagara County Home Telephone Company.” This company appears to have been formed by the merger of several prior constituent companies, of which The Niagara Falls Home Telephone Company was one. Evidently intending to begin an action against The Niagara County Home Telephone Company, service of a summons was made upon one E. Max Eaton, who, the plaintiff claims,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grant v. ShoesNew York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API