Berry v. Vreeland
Supreme Court of New Jersey
This cause came before the Court upon the argument of a rule to shew cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action of trespass quare clamum fregit, tried at the Hudson Circuit at March Term 1845. The plaintiff complained that the defendants, on the 17th of August, 1843, and on divers other days between that day, and the commencement of the suit broke and entered the plaintiff’s close, and there dug and carried away large quantities of earth, gravel and stone, and brought and deposited thereon large quantities of earth, gravel, and stone, and dug large ditches, drains and sluices, and thereby caused the water which fell during the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cabakov v. ThatcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Bardack v. ExtractNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Dandrea v. CentofanteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Paparazzo v. PerkelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951