Legal Opinion

Dandrea v. Centofante

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 19, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

13 N.J. Super. 445 (1951)

80 A.2d 647

MURIEL BRYER DANDREA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NATALE CENTOFANTE AND SUSIE CENTOFANTE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 16, 1951.

Decided April 19, 1951.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Dominick F. Pachella argued the cause for appellants (Mr. J. Chester Massinger, attorney).

Mr. John E. Selser argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Selser & Shenier, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff-respondent in conformity with the verdict of the jury has a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gelsmine v. VignaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Nusser v. United Parcel Service of N.Y., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Salvato v. New Jersey Asphalt & Paving Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  4. Berry v. VreelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1847

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cabakov v. ThatcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Reale v. Tp. of WayneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Moore v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Bardack v. ExtractNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API