Legal Opinion

Paparazzo v. Perkel

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 24, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

16 N.J. Super. 128 (1951)

84 A.2d 11

LOUISE PAPARAZZO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MAX H. PERKEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS CRYSTAL BAR & GRILL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 8, 1951.

Decided October 24, 1951.

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

Mr. Jacob E. Max argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg, of counsel).

Mr. Elmer J. Bennett argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, attorneys; Messrs. Patrick A. Dwyer and James P. Beggans, of counsel).

The opinion of the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Salvato v. New Jersey Asphalt & Paving Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  3. Slovak Catholic Sokol v. FotiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Bardack v. ExtractNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Dandrea v. CentofanteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bartell v. RazzanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API