Legal Opinion

Reed v. Abrahamson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1991No. 9015SC568PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Because we find merit in plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely, we first address plaintiff’s motion and need not reach the merits of defendants’ appeals.

Plaintiff moves to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 3(c) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure for the reason that defendants failed to give notice of appeal within thirty (30) days after the entry of judgment in this action. The giving of notice of appeal within the prescribed period is a jurisdictional requirement and defendants’ failure to give timely notice renders the Court of Appeals without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Booth v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Ives v. Real-Venture, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Behar v. TOYOTA OF FAYETTEVILLE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Patel v. Mid Southwest ElectricCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reed v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API