Behar v. TOYOTA OF FAYETTEVILLE, INC.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing Toyota’s appeal for failure to give timely notice of appeal. For reasons set out herein, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.
The trial court determined that the entry of judgment was 8 May 1987 when the jury returned a verdict requiring Toyota to pay plaintiffs $22,900.00 and requiring plaintiffs to return the 1984 Toyota motor home to Toyota. Toyota contends that the judgment was entered when the 26 June 1987 judgment was filed.
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 58 provides as follows:
Subject to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Landin Ltd. v. Sharon Luggage, Ltd., of Greensboro, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stachlowski v. StachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Cobb v. Rocky Mount Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Reed v. AbrahamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Cobb v. Rocky Mount Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991