Legal Opinion

Philpott v. Standard Oil Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 21, 1943No. Civ. 4781PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLOEB, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Henry Philpott, filed his petition under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. In it he seeks a recovery of overtime pay on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, as is permitted under the provisions of Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b); and he asks, in addition, for liquidated damages, attorney fees and costs.

First the defendant filed a motion seeking, among other things, to strike that clause from the plaintiff’s complaint in which he states that he sues “in behalf of himself and other employees similarly…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. Morley Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Travis v. RayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  4. Fleming v. Warshawsky & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Robertson v. Argus Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Guess v. MontagueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  3. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
  5. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. v. Muscoda Local 123District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API