Legal Opinion
Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. v. Muscoda Local 123
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided March 28, 1946No. 5232PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MULLINS, District Judge.
This action originated as a bill for declaratory judgment brought to determine, primarily, whether certain travel time spent by underground ore miners in the plaintiff’s ore mines constituted a part of the workweek within the terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., requiring payment of overtime compensation for hours during such workweek in excess of the maximum hours established in that law. The defendants appeared by answer and in addition filed counterclaims on behalf of themselves, certain other employees of the plaintiff alleged…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Culver v. Bell & Loffland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. Muscoda Local No. 123District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Durkin v. Pet Milk Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
- Adams v. Bell Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
- Chemical Bank New York Trust Co. v. Steamship WesthamptonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.