Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Oechsli

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1918No. 3,897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeals from District Court, Silver Bow County; J. J. Lynch, Judge. Action by E. A. Roberts and D. M. Morgan against George Oechsli, P. A. Coiner and E. E Mayer. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendants appeal from it and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

Defendants made application for patent for the Hugo quartz lode mining claim, and plaintiffs adversed and brought this action to have determined the relative rights of the parties to portions of the ground claimed by each. Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and from an order denying a new trial defendants appealed.

1. Complaint is made that the court unduly restricted the cross-examination of one of the plaintiffs, but the record discloses that the widest latitude was allowed in the cross-examination of all the witnesses.

2. Plaintiff Morgan was asked to state his reason for joining [1]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Morris State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Garfield M. & M. Co. v. HammerMontana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wilson v. FreemanMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Smith v. ShookMontana Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Parsons v. RiceMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Heilman v. LoughrinMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Freisheimer v. Missoula Creamery Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. ProutyMontana Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API