Legal Opinion

Freisheimer v. Missoula Creamery Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1922No. 4,868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER FORD

prepared the opinion for the court.

This action was instituted to recover damages for destruction of property and for personal injuries occasioned by a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and defendant’s truck.

The plaintiff in his complaint sets forth two causes of action. In his first cause of action he alleges the incorporation of the defendant and the city of Missoula, and that the city passed an ordinance, which provided that a vehicle meeting another should turn to the right; a vehicle turning into another street to the left shall pass around the point of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Birsch v. Citizens' Electric Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Melville v. Butte-Balaklava Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Surman v. CruseMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Puckett v. Sherman & ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hughes v. Hudson-Brace Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wells, Inc. v. ShoemakeNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Burns v. EmingerMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Mihelich v. Butte Electric Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Brown v. Columbia Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API