Legal Opinion

Seber v. Union Pacific Railroad

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided August 16, 2011No. 14-10-00195-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice.

Charles and Barbara Seber sued Union Pacific Railroad Company contending that it wrongfully removed the Sebers’ private railroad crossing. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Union Pacific. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand to the trial court.

BACKGROUND

This dispute centers on the closing of a private crossing over Union Pacific’s railroad right-of-way, which runs along the entire southern boundary of the Sebers’ property. Before it was closed, the crossing allowed access between the Sebers’ property and Hufsmith-Kuykendahl Road on…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jerry Vernon v. William Perrien and Roxanne Perrien, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2012
  2. Soon Phat, L.P. v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. David Hamrick, Maggie Hamrick, Sue Bertram and Steve Bertram v. Tom Ward and Betsey WardTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Hamrick v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  5. Avelo Mortgage, LLC v. Infinity Capital, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API