Legal Opinion

Snell v. Prescott

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1930No. 5347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNAUGHTON, J.

— In 1918 the respondents, H. C. Prescott and Ellen E. Prescott, quit their farm near Nampa. Prescott had purchased Lot 55 of Block 55 of the original town site of Nampa. They had been engaged in farming for over 45 years, part of the time in Minnesota, most of the time in Idaho. Upon moving to town they did not sell the farm nor the stock or personal property on it. It seems their farm consisted of eighty acres of very productive land, forty acres of which were in the name of H. C. Prescott and claimed by him as his separate property, and the other forty were in the name of his wife, Ellen…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Salmon v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
  3. Brady v. IrbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Second National Bank of Beloit v. MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Feltham v. BlunckIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mohar v. McLelland Lumber CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Noble v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Buhl State Bank v. GlanderIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  4. SPOKANE MERCHANTS'ASSOCIATION v. OlmsteadIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Kantola v. HendricksonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API