Legal Opinion

Second National Bank of Beloit v. Merrill

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Rock County. Garnishment. The facts are stated in the opinion. to the point that the gift of the note by S. T. Merrill to his son was a valid gift and the delivery sufficient, cited, besides cases cited in the opinion, Hunter v. Hunter, 19 Barb. 631, 638; Smith v. Vodges', 92 U. S. 183; Patterson v. McKinney, 97 Ill. 41; Merrell v. Johnson, 96 id. 224; Bennett v. Bed-ford Bank, 11 Mass. 421; Pike v. Miles, 23 Wis¡ 164; Phillips v. Woost'er,…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Rock County. Garnishment. The facts are stated in the opinion. to the point that the gift of the note by S. T. Merrill to his son was a valid gift and the delivery sufficient, cited, besides cases cited in the opinion, Hunter v. Hunter, 19 Barb. 631, 638; Smith v. Vodges', 92 U. S. 183; Patterson v. McKinney, 97 Ill. 41; Merrell v. Johnson, 96 id. 224; Bennett v. Bed-ford Bank, 11 Mass. 421; Pike v. Miles, 23 Wis¡ 164; Phillips v. Woost'er, 36 N. Y. 412. • There was a sufficient consideration to support the promise of S. T. Merrill to pay larger wages to his…

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 17, 1891:

OktoN, J.

The respondent commenced an action against the Merrill & Houston Iron Works and S. T. Merrill and C. E. G-. Collins, on a note of $5,000 given by said Collins to Merrill & Houston Iron Works, and indorsed by the said company on July 13, Í883, and indorsed by S. T. Merrill on October 24, 1883. Pending such action, garnishee proceedings were instituted against the appellant, Louis B. Merrill, to answer as to his having or holding any property belonging to the defendant in the action, S. T. Merrill. On issue joined, the main question…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sexton v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Seward v. Jackson ex dem. Van WyckCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
  3. Salmon v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
  4. Clark v. KillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Gardner v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Charmley v. CharmleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Jost v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Goelz v. People's Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. SlaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Pirie v. Le SaulnierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API