Legal Opinion
Alberty Food Products v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1952No. 13062PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
The facts of this case have been stipulated. They appear in detail in the opinion of the District Court. D.C.S.D.Cal. 1951, 98 F.Supp. 23, 25. For our purposes it is sufficient to state that appellants manufacture, pack and distribute certain drugs in interstate commerce. The District Court found the drugs ■ in question to be “misbranded” within the meaning of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act in that their labeling failed to bear “adequate directions for use”. 21 U.S.C.A; § 352(f)(1). An injunction was issued permanently restraining appellants from introducing into…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. El-O-Pathic Pharmacy United States v. Hudson Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Colgrove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Alberty Food Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. VARIOUS QUANTITIES OF ARTICLES OF DRUG LABELEDDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- United States v. Alberty Food ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. 42 Jars, More or Less, of an Article of Drug Labeled in Part "Bee Royale Capsules". Appeal of Bee Royale, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- United States v. HohenseeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- United States v. an Article of Drug Consisting of 250 JarsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963
- United States v. Ellis Research Laboratories, Inc., and Robert W. Ellis, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- United States v. El Rancho Adolphus Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.