Legal Opinion
Colgrove v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 8, 1949No. 11832PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment holding the appellants in criminal contempt of a preliminary and permanent injunction issued under 21 U.S.C.A. § 332(a), a provision of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
The corporate appellant is controlled by the individual appellant Colgrove. For a number of years Colgrove has been marketing through this or other companies two products, Colusa Natural Oil and Colusa Natural Oil in capsules, and has advertised them on a national scale as remedies beneficial in the treatment of various skin diseases. His court experience 'in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Clarke v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Empire Oil & Gas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. ColgroveDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
- United States v. 9 BOTTLES, ETC.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1947
3Cited by15 opinions
- Terminal Construction Corp. v. Bergen County Hackensack River Sanitary Sewer District AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Nat Yanish v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. El-O-Pathic Pharmacy United States v. Hudson Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Nutrition Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Alberty Food Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.