United States v. Hohensee
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants were indicted on nine counts for causing the introduction and delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of misbranded drugs, contrary to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 321 et seq.1 *369Counts VIII and IX were withdrawn by the government in the course of the trial and nolle prossed. All three appellants were convicted on the remaining seven counts.
The government’s theory and proof involved two parallel sets of incidents. The individual appellant is president of one of the corporate appellants, Scientific Living, Inc. and the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. ChicarelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Article . Consisting of 216Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. George Arwood Stidham and Tommy Leroy BaconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Ellis Research Laboratories, Inc., and Robert W. Ellis, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Hanson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.