Pete v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge
The sole issue presented in this case is whether section 304(c) of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4654(c) (1970), authorizes the payment of litigation expenses by the United States in an inverse condemnation action involving personal, as opposed to real, property. After consideration of the briefs and oral arguments presented, we find that plaintiffs are entitled to recover appropriate litigation expenses under that statute.
This case is the latest in a protracted line of litigation on defendant’s liability for the alleged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pete v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Drakes Bay Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- United States v. 967.905 Acres of Land in Cook CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCarran International Airport v. SisolakNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Independence Park Apartments v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Cloverport Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Perry v. Grand River Dam AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.