Legal Opinion
Perry v. Grand River Dam Authority
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 31, 2013No. Nos. 109,714, 109,715 and 109,716PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY L. GOODMAN, Judge.
11 Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA) appeals the trial court's orders awarding damages in inverse condemnation to Robert and Brenda Perry (Perrys), David and Stacy Pryor (Pryors), and John D. and Janet M. Shaw (Shaws). Perrys, Pryors, and Shaws counter-appeal the court's ruling denying their request for damages for personal property.1
FACTS
T2 The Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA) was created by the State of Oklahoma for the purpose of constructing the Pensacola Dam on the Grand River to create the Grand Lake O' the Cherokees (Grand Lake) which is an impoundment of waters…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The City of Miami, Oklahoma v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. Lyons Enters., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- PERRY v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013