Legal Opinion
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Carlson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 20, 1999No. C8-98-1383, C1-98-1385, C4-98-1428PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge '
Respondents Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC), Independent School District No. 882 (ISD 882), and Wright Electric, Inc., an electrical contractor who submitted the low bid for ISD 882’s new high school project (Wright Electric), brought this declaratory judgment action against appellants, the governor of Minnesota and two state commissioners (state appellants). 1 Respondents sought a declaration interpreting Minn.Stat. § 121.15, subd. la (Supp.1997) as not requiring that their construction project follow the prevailing wage act; respondents alternatively…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Stansell v. City of NorthfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Masters v. Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- JAS Apartments, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003