JAS Apartments, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellants challenge the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the City of Minneapolis and denial of class certification. Because Minn.Stat. § 444.075, subd. 3 (2002), permits the City of Minneapolis to charge property owners sewer fees based on water consumption, we affirm.
FACTS
Respondent City of Minneapolis (the city) maintains two distinct sewer systems. The sanitary sewer collects sewage from sewer mains, street conduits, and pumping systems, and channels it to sewage treatment plants. The storm-water drainage system collects, transports, and manages water…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.