People v. Bauer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mollen, P. J.
On this appeal, the principal issue dividing this court concerns the sufficiency of the evidence of the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the first degree. Viewing the evidence, as we must, in a light most favorable to the prosecution, giving it the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom (see, Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307, 319; People v Lewis, 64 NY2d 1111, 1112; People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, cert denied — US —, 105 S Ct 327; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we conclude that the defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. CantyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- People v. DurkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. BrensicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. GiallombardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.