Legal Opinion

People v. Canty

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1983PublishedCited by 189 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

None of the three grounds urged by defendant warrants reversal of his conviction. There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s rulings as to the use of evidence of defendant’s prior convictions for impeachment purposes if he took the witness stand. Accordingly, beyond this, appellate review of the trial court’s rulings terminated at the Appellate Division (People v Pollock, 50 NY2d 547, 549-550).

Defendant’s contention, that inasmuch as there was no independent evidence that his alibi had been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. PollockNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. MacAnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API