Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Rosengarten

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 2005PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 Sheri Rosengárten, an incapacitated person, appeals from the December 17, 2008 order that, inter alia, allowed her residence to be sold. We hold that: 1) Ms. Rosengárten has standing to pursue this appeal; 2) she has -the right to be represented by counsel of her choice; and 3) the orphans’ court committed error by proceeding to order the sale of Ms. Rosengar-ten’s real estate without first conducting a hearing on a) her allegation that she was no longer incapacitated and b) her allegation that her guardian was not acting in her best interest and her related request…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re HicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Lines v. Lines, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1891
  3. In Re ScheidmantelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Bryden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. In Re Estate of ScharlachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gavin, M., Aplts. v. Loeffelbein, E.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. In Re:Petition of Navarra, S. Appeal of:Navarra,CSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. In re D.L.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Estate of A.J.M., Appeal of: Lynch Law GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Estate of Beidl, M. Appeal of: Beidl, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API