Legal Opinion
Chiolis v. Lage Development Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1994No. 18213PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
Lage Development Company and United Fire & Casualty Company (Lage) appeal the circuit court’s ruling which affirmed a decision of the South Dakota Department of La*159bor (Department) in favor of George Chiolis (Chiolis) on Chiolis’ claim for vocational rehabilitation benefits. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On February 15, 1989, Chiolis, while employed with Lage as a carpenter, fell from a roof fracturing the radial head of his right elbow. Following a number of medical procedures, it was determined that Chiolis would not be able to return to his usual and customary employment as a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cozine v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of Estate of PejsaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Wendel v. Domestic Seed & SupplySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ochs v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Kurtenbach v. Frito-LaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Broken Arrow v. McArterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Sutherland v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Chiolis v. Lage Development Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.