In Re Appeal in Navajo County Juvenile Action No. JV91000058
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
The appellant juvenile was found delinquent after confessing to his junior high school principal that he had set a fire in a student locker. We hold that appellant’s statements were voluntary, that the juvenile court correctly found them admissible into evidence, and that the principal was neither obliged to give Miranda 1 warnings to the juvenile nor to give him the warnings required of peace officers and court officers pursuant to Rule 7(a), Arizona Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court, 17B Ariz.Rev. StatAnn. (“A.R.S.”).
Background
Appellant started a fire in a locker…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SnyderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- S.E. Ex Rel. A.E. v. Grant County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- J.D. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- State v. TinkhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- In Re Jorge D.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- People v. N.A.S.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.