Legal Opinion
In Re Jorge D.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 9, 2002No. 1 CA-JV 01-0045PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
¶ 1 Jorge D. (“Juvenile”) appeals from an adjudication finding him delinquent for having committed aggravated assault, and from a disposition order committing him to the Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections until his eighteenth birthday. The main issue on appeal relates to the admissibility of Juvenile’s confession. Juvenile moved to suppress on grounds that his confession to a police officer in the school principal’s office was obtained in violation of Miranda, 1 and was also involuntary. The juvenile court denied the motion to suppress without holding a hearing.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Michael Alvarado v. R.Q. Hickman, Warden, Acting Warden of Mule Creek State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- J.D. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.