Legal Opinion
J.D. v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided January 28, 2004No. Record No. 2335-02-2PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN III, Judge.
A jury found J.D., a juvenile, guilty of petit larceny. On appeal, J.D. challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress incriminating statements. J.D. contends his statements, which he made in the office of his school’s assistant principal, were admitted in violation of the Supreme Court’s holding in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and that the statements were compelled and involuntary in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights. Finding no error in the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress, we affirm J.D.’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- S.E. Ex Rel. A.E. v. Grant County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- In re J.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Herron v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Kalmakoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Kalmakoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.