Poindexter v. Lion Oil Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiffs below sought to cancel two oil and gas leases on lands owned by them. Producing oil wells had been completed on lands immediately adjoining plaintiff’s lands and were producing in large volume. The defendant, Lion Oil Company, holds the leases on plaintiffs’ lands, and has refused to drill on them and has announced that it has no intention of ever drilling unless further exploration in the field by some operator other than itself discovers producing formations other than those from which production is now being had on the adjoining lands. Its experts are of the opinion that wells…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Myers v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Eastern Oil Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Ezzell v. Oil Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. GillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Smith v. MoodySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Gray v. CameronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Roberson Enterprises v. MILLER LAND & LUMBER, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Davis v. Ross Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Hill v. Larcon CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.