Legal Opinion

Huff v. Huff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2008No. 77A01-0803-CV-101PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

Lloyd N. Huff, as trustee of the Elihu W. Huff Trust, Lloyd N. Huff, as beneficiary of the Elihu W. Huff Trust, and Edith Ham, now deceased, by her duly authorized attorney-in-fact, John Ham, as beneficiary of the Elihu W. Huff Trust (collectively “Beneficiaries”), appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Maxine Huff and the Estate of Wayne Huff (“Wayne’s Estate”). The Beneficiaries raise three issues, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred by granting in part the motion for summary judgment filed by Maxine and Wayne’s Estate. On…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hinds v. McNairIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Malachowski v. Bank One, IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. WrigleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. U.S. Research Consultants, Inc. v. The County of Lake, Indiana Board of Commissioners of the County of Lake, Indiana, in their official capacities and the Lake County TreasurerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Huff v. HuffIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Brenda Sue Gittings and Marc Richmond Gittings v. William H. DealIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Bank of America, N.A. v. CartwrightDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API