Legal Opinion
Cyr v. District Court In & For the City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 9, 1984No. 83SA307PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
Petitioner Frank Cyr, Jr., filed this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21 for relief in the nature of mandamus. He challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion for entry of a final judgment pursuant to C.R.C.P. 54(b). We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.
I
The petitioner filed a complaint in the district court naming Willamette Management Associates, Inc. (Willamette), an Oregon corporation, as one of the defendants. The complaint alleges that Willamette and the other defendants are liable to petitioner for damages arising from certain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Herrscher v. HerrscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Weisman v. LeLandaisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Hoen v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marks v. GesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cyr v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR CITY & CTY. OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984