Legal Opinion
Weisman v. LeLandais
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 22, 1976No. Nos. 505, 848, Docket 75-7250, 75-7264PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Per curiam
The main question presented in these two appeals is whether the District Court correctly dismissed the amended complaints. Jurisdiction is invoked under various federal statutes, but for the purpose of this review we need be concerned only with 28 *309U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332, 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § lá83. The orders appealed from were filed March 12, 1975, and are endorsed on the defendants’ motions to dismiss. The orders simply state “Motion granted. The complaint is dismissed. So ORDERED,” over the signature of the Honorable Charles E. Stewart, Jr., of the Southern District, to whom the eases were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Dorothy Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., and Stelux Manufacturing Co., and Bulova Watch Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Acevedo Villalobos v. Hon. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Robert Czeremcha v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Barbara Quartana v. John D. Utterback D/B/A All Star Dairy Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Michael Korgich v. Regents of the New Mexico School of Mines, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.