Breazeale v. Victim Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge
The first question presented by this motion to compel arbitration is whether the Federal Arbitration Act applies to a contract between a local prosecutor and a criminal suspect about how to address a potential state-law criminal violation. It does not.
The second question is whether California law allows arbitration of a dispute, between a citizen and the government or its agents, arising out of the exercise of the government’s criminal law enforcement powers. It does not.
I
The California Legislature has…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rittmann v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Victim Servs., Inc. v. Consumer Fin. Prot. BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bean v. ES Partners, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
- Jackson v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Rogers v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.