Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Lyft, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 7, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01938Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN ROGERS, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01938-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO v. COMPEL ARBITRATION; REMANDING REQUEST FOR LYFT, INC., PUBLIC INJUNCTION Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 19 In this case, three Lyft drivers have filed an emergency motion to require Lyft to reclassify all of its drivers in California from “independent contractor” to “employee” status, as required by California’s new law governing worker classification. The plaintiffs’ frustration with Lyft’s steadfast refusal to comply with…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API