Legal Opinion

People v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 21, 1992No. 91SA335PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, a hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings of a hearing board, and recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six months, and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. We accept the recommendation of the hearing panel.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on September 27, 1972. He is registered as an attorney upon this court’s official records, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this court and its grievance committee in these proceedings. C.R.C.P. 241.-1(b). The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Moffat County School District RE No. 1Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. AlleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. KaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Zinger v. TerrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. A-1 Auto Repair & Detail, Inc. v. Bilunas-HardyColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. HanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. People v. PrimaveraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API