Legal Opinion
White v. Cascade Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1936No. Civ. 1778PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNDO, J., pro tem.
On May 25, 1932, appellant Cascade Oil Company entered into a contract in writing with respondent White. This contract was, on July 21, 1932, superseded by a novation which eliminated one of the parties of the first part. No other changes of consequence were made. The contract in part recites: “That whereas, the party of the first part (White) is the owner of, or has under his control, oil and gas mining leases covering a certain five-acre tract of land . . . (description of land) and has arrived at an agreement with said party of the second part (Cascade Oil Company)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Eberhard v. Pacific Southwest Loan & Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Lopizich v. SalterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Totah Drilling Company v. AbrahamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Continental Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Service Employees International Union, Local 18 v. American Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Retsal Drilling Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.